Monday, August 13, 2007

Toussaint

You can click on the picture to enlarge it.
It shows Toussaint L'Ouverture (1743-1803).

Toussaint broke France's grip on Haiti, and destroyed any chance that Haiti could ever be enslaved again.

Toussaint was the leader of the Haïtian Revolution, and the first leader of a free Haiti.

Toussaint was not the first revolutionary in Haiti's history. In 1791, slave revolts broke out in Haiti, and plantations went up in flames. It took Toussaint a while to join the revolution. The early leaders of these rebellions were far too willing to compromise with whites who sounded radical.

Toussaint scorned those early rebel leaders, and used his experience in administration and implementation of authority to gather a following of his own, to train soldiers, and to lead a Black Haitian army to victories against the European troops.

Toussaint led Haiti to victory over the European occupiers, and established his control over Haiti in 1797.

He expelled the French commissioner, Léger-Félicité Sonthonax, as well as the British armies, invaded Santo Domingo to free the slaves there, and wrote a constitution naming himself governor for life.

Between 1800 and 1802, Toussaint tried to rebuild the collapsed economy of Haiti and to re-establish commercial contacts with the United States and Great Britain. Although he was deceived by Napoleon, caged, and exiled to France, he had given the colony a taste of freedom that could not ever be taken away.

He had destroyed slavery forever in Haiti.

As early as 1797, General Toussaint had written this, to France:

“Blind as they are!...Do you think that men who have been able to enjoy the blessing of liberty will calmly see it snatched away?...If they had a thousand lives they would sacrifice them all rather than be forced back into slavery again. But no, the same hand which has broken our chains will not enslave us anew.”

--This quote is taken from C.L.R. James' book entitled "The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution" (Published in 1938).


France went broke fighting Haiti.

That’s why France sold the “Louisiana Purchase” to the United States.

__________________________________________


You can click on this picture to enlarge it.

It shows C.L.R. James (1901-1989), pioneering historian of the Haitian Revolution.
He was also a leader of pan-African political thought, and Chair of the International African Friends of Abyssinia, which fought against Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935.
__________________________________________

The U.S. Mail was censored to keep anti-slavery publications from reaching the South

You can click on this picture to enlarge it.

It shows Frederick Douglass, who publicly spoke and wrote against slavery from 1841 until it was abolished at last.

Until abolitionists, like Douglass, got heard, slavery was not a major subject of public discussion among white people in the United States.

A few old anti-slavery societies had continued a quiet existence, most of them in the South, without being noticed much.

But starting with the 1830's, the abolitionists, Black and white, men and women, got themselves noticed.

They taught that not only the slaveholders, but the people of the North too -- were all responsible for the crime of slavery.

The new abolitionists, of the 1830's, refused the completely insincere proposal of "gradual emancipation" of slaves, or the idea of sending free Black people to form colonies in Africa.

These new abolitionists, in 1831, began to organize the New England Anti-slavery Society, and started a movement which spread throughout the North.

As Carl Schurz, a U.S. Senator after the Civil War, tried to explain it:


"This agitation was carried on with singular devotion, but its startling radicalism did not at first enlist large numbers of converts, or result in the organization of a political force that might have made itself felt at the polls. It did, however, have the effect of exciting great irritation and alarm among the slave-holders, and among those in the North who feared that a searching discussion of the slavery question might disturb the peace of the country; and thus it started a commotion of grave consequences."


In 1831, a slave revolt broke out in Virginia under the leadership of Nat Turner. It was suppressed, but caused a widespread panic among slaveholders, and a huge military mobilization of the white population.

In 1833, the emancipation of the slaves in the British West Indies made the slaveholders keenly aware of the hostility of public opinion in the outside world, and increased their alarm. Events like these gave the agitation of the abolitionists a new significance.

The slaveholders fiercely denounced the Northern abolitionists as reckless incendiaries, inciting the slaves to insurrection, robbery, and murder, -- as enemies to the country, as fiends in human shape, who deserved to be hung.


The slaveholders demanded that the North silence the abolitionists by force; that laws be made to imprison their speakers, to stop their presses, to prevent the circulation of their tracts, and by every means to put down their agitation. They said that, unless this were done, the United States, as a country, could not survive.

A fierce outcry arose in the Free States against the abolitionists. Turbulent mobs, composed in part of men of property and prominent standing, broke up anti-slavery meetings, destroyed their printing-offices, wrecked their houses, and threatened them with violent death. There were riotous attacks upon anti-slavery gatherings in Philadelphia, New York, Utica, and Montpelier. In Boston, William Lloyd Garrison was dragged through the streets with a halter round his body. In Connecticut and New Hampshire, schools which received Black pupils were sacked.

In Cincinnati, a large meeting of citizens resolved that an anti-slavery paper published there must cease to appear, and that there must be "total silence on the subject of slavery." A foaming mob executed the decree, threw the press into the Ohio, and looted the homes of Black citizens. Some time later, Pennsylvania Hall, the meeting house of the abolitionists, was burned in Philadelphia, and the famous abolitionist Elijah P. Lovejoy was murdered in Illinois.


But this violent persecution failed to silence the abolitionists.

The number of abolition societies grew, not rapidly, but steadily. The leading abolitionists themselves never became popular with the multitude. But the immediate effect of their work has frequently been much underrated. The abolitionists served to keep alive in the Northern mind that secret trouble of conscience about slavery which later, in a ripe political situation, was to break out as a great force. They accomplished another immediate result of the highest importance.

By the alarm they excited in the South the abolitionists caused slavery to disclose to public view, more openly than ever before, those tendencies which made it incompatible with the fundamental conditions of free government.


The slavery question then started appearing in tracts and periodicals by the abolition societies. Those publications caused an outcry from the South that those publications were calculated to incite slaves to insurrection.

On July 29, 1835, the post-office of Charleston in South Carolina was invaded by a mob, who took out what anti-slavery documents they could find and destroyed them. A public meeting, at which the clergy of all denominations appeared in a body, ratified these proceedings. The postmaster of Charleston assumed the right to prevent the circulation of such literature, and wrote to the postmaster at New York, Samuel L. Gouverneur, to stop its transmission. Gouverneur asked the Postmaster General for instructions.

The U.S. Postmaster General, Amos Kendall, answered that the law had not vested any power in his department to exclude any species of newspapers or pamphlets from the mail, for such a power would be "fearfully dangerous;" but if any postmaster took the responsibility of stopping those "inflammatory papers," he would "stand justified in that step before the country and all mankind." His instructions to the postmaster at Charleston were of the same tenor. It was patriotism, he said, to disregard the law if its observance would produce a public danger. "Entertaining these views," he added, "I cannot sanction, and will not condemn, the step you have taken."

In August, 1835, the Anti-slavery Society of Massachusetts published an "Address to the Public" in which rushed to say that, no, they were not circulated incendiary publications among the slaves, and, no, they had no desire to incite any slaves to revolt.


But the slaveholders decided that any declaration that all men were born free and equal was "incendiary."

So the U.S. mail became effectively censored, to prevent any anti-slavery material from reaching the South.

____________________________________


How did Black America free itself?

You can click on this picture to enlarge it.

Never, until 1865, could any Black person feel safe, or feel that their families were safe, from white kidnappers and slave-catchers. No matter where a free Black person lived, North or South, even sometimes in Canada, they were always in danger of being kidnapped and sold into slavery.

In 1793, the U.S. Congress made it a crime to help any fugitive slave, anywhere in the United States. This law was made even more harsh in 1850.


In December 1799, over seventy free Black Philadelphians, led by two prominent Black ministers, the Reverend Richard Allen and the Reverend Absalom Jones, submitted a petition to the U.S. House of Representatives, asking for some legal protection against kidnappers and slave-catchers. Congress bluntly refused to give free Black people even the slightest protection from these kidnappers.

And so, nine years years later, the same Reverend Richard Allen, possibly the most famous Black man in the United States, was himself almost kidnapped back into slavery, in the city of Philadelphia.

In 1808, Rev. Allen was found by a slave-catcher, in Philadelphia, who tried to take him back into slavery. Only because the Rev. Allen was famous, only because he was well-known by the judges, and only because he could afford to hire lawyers, he was saved.

So, with the entire white power structure defending slavery...

...How did Black America free itself, a little bit under 60 years later?
__________________________________________

How did Black America free itself from slavery?

Click on picture to enlarge it.

Southern and Northern Congressmen did everything possible to keep Black America in chains.

Every free Black person knew that they could be kidnapped back into slavery, no matter how far North they went.

Here is what a Northern Congressman said about free Black people in the North:

Congressman John Brown, of Rhode Island, said that he supported slavery. Brown said that slaves who moved North had come only “to reside as vagabonds and thieves”.

That same Congressman Brown kept right on being a slave trader, for many years, even after it was outlawed by both Rhode Island and Congress.

When you see Brown University, in Rhode Island, remember that it was named for his nephew. Remember that Brown University's building, “University Hall”, was built at least partly with slave labor.

(Many years later, a totally different man, also named John Brown, fought to end slavery.)

Congress simply refused to protect free Black people from kidnappers. Congress decided that even discussing the subject would create disquiet and jealousy in Congress.So with the entire white power structure protecting slavery, how did Black America free itself?

____________________________________________


Sunday, August 12, 2007

In 1793, why did Congress make it legal for slaveholders, or their agents, to kidnap any Black person, anywhere in the United States?

You can click on the picture to enlarge it.


This is a picture of Prince Hall, a minister in the African Methodist Episcopal Church , in Boston.

He campaigned to abolish slavery. He also tried to get the government to pay for Black education in 1787, but the Massachusetts legislature refused to do it, even though Black and white citizens all had to pay taxes. For many years, the local government also refused to find a building to create a school for the Black children of Boston. Finally, he opened a school for Black children in his home, and recruited some Harvard students to teach there.

You might not believe it, but even in 1788, a determined Black man could still win victories against the entire white power structure.

In early February 1788, three free Black men from Boston were lured onto a ship by a captain promising work. Instead, the men were kidnapped, shipped to the Caribbean, and sold as slaves.

In a February 27, 1788 petition, attacking the slave trade, Prince Hall and 21 others stated their outrage at the seizure of their fellow citizens.

he Massachusetts legislature did listen to Hall on this one issue: they outlawed slave-trading inside Massachusetts’ borders.

Governor John Hancock, and the French consul in Boston, pushed to get the men released from the French island of St. Bartholomew.

This was extremely unusual. The great majority of slaves had no governor willing to help them, North or South.

In fact, in 1793, the federal “Fugitive Slave Act” made it totally legal for escaped slaves to be kidnapped by slaveholders or their agents, anywhere in the United States. By 1850, an even more severe federal law was passed, depriving fugitive slaves of any rights, even in Massachusetts.
____________________________________________

Why Did Whites Claim the Right to Kidnap African Americans?


“Kidnapping was perhaps the greatest fear of free blacks in pre-Civil War America. Though they may have descended from generations of free-born people or worked to purchase their freedom, free blacks were not able to enjoy the privileges and opportunities of white Americans.

“They lived with the constant threat of kidnapping and enslavement against which they had little recourse.”

-- From publicity for the book “Freedom at Risk”, by Carol Wilson (Associate Professor of History; Washington College, Chestertown, Maryland; Director of Gender Studies; E-mail: cwilson2@washcoll.edu ; Phone: 800-422-1782, ext. 7759)

________________________________________


Why did whites say Native Americans were terrorists?


You can click on this picture to enlarge it.

You can click on this picture to enlarge it.


These prints (from 1707 & 1778) accuse Native Americans of invading white settlers’ homes and lands.


But who came on ships, from Europe, to invade North America and take the land?

And what happened to hundreds of Native American nations after that?
___________________________________________